Smaller towns and cities get aggressive on energy efficiencies
The Northwest region's three largest cities are working to combine federal, state and local dollars to incentivize energy efficiencies. But what about some of the region’s smaller cities? Small cities have as much to gain – and to lose – as the big urban centers.
I have written about energy efficiency programs in Cascadia’s three largest cities and how each of these communities is working to combine federal, state and local dollars to incentivize energy efficiencies.
What about some of the region’s smaller cities? Small cities have as much to gain – and to lose – as the big urban centers.
When I was last in Oregon I was surprised to hear that Lincoln City was endeavoring to become carbon neutral. One of the last times I was in Lincoln City was to see George Jones
at the Chinook Winds Casino. It seemed the last place in the world that
would be making carbon neutrality a goal. But Lincoln city has a lot at
stake.
At just 11 feet above sea level, Lincoln City is well
within the danger zone for rising sea levels caused by global warming.
So, they’re getting proactive. The City will combine a mix of energy
savings along with purchase of renewable energy and carbon credits to
achieve neutrality. There is some ongoing debate about whether these
methods truly lead to neutrality. But it’s hard to argue with Lincoln
City’s dedication to efficiencies and sustainability
-- and even the Casino has taken measures to shed 900 tons of emissions
annually. Because of this focus, Lincoln City became an EPA Green Power Community in 2007.
And speaking of Green Power Communities, Bellingham, Washington, was not only selected for the program but became the Washington's first green power community. The EPA’s program focuses on voluntary
community-wide efforts to create energy efficiencies and reduce the
environmental impacts of energy consumption including greenhouse gas
emissions.
This fall, Bellingham will initiate the Energy Efficiency Community Challenge aimed
at substantially reducing Bellingham and Whatcom County’s consumption
of electricity through an incentive program designed to motivate
retrofits of existing residential and commercial buildings.
The
strategy is similar to Portland’s and Seattle’s, with low interest
loans funded through the use of Energy Efficiency and Conservation
Block Grant money, a social marketing program to promote the loans, and
training programs to prepare workers for green jobs doing the
retrofits.
The goals of Bellingham’s program are ambitious.
In the first 18 months, the plan seeks to have 100 Whatcom County
businesses reducing their energy use a minimum of 5 to 15 per cent and
1000 residential housing units saving 5-30 percent of their energy use.
The work of retrofits should eliminate 2,100 metric tons of CO2 per
year, create $24,875,000 of economic activity in Whatcom County and
create 35 new green collar jobs.
Smaller towns and cities in the
region aren’t being left behind the race to create energy efficiencies
and reduce their impact on climate change. And the side benefits –
jobs, efficiency savings, and quality of life – may be substantial.
Posted by
Roger Valdez in Sightline Institute's Daily Score

